Championship Game result:
Tipton 13, Hartford City 2 (TITLE)
Click here to return to the top of the page.
Indiana District 10 Tournament
Tournament Results:
District 10 is using a pool play format. Leagues are divided into two pools for round-robin competition, and the top four teams in each pool advance to the quarterfinal round. All games played after the completion of pool competition will use a single-elimination format.
Pool Competition Results:
(Pool 'A' Participants: Auburn, Churubusco, Don Ayres Time Corners American, Elmhurst, Georgetown American, Georgetown National, Northcrest, St. Joe Central National, and Weisser Park)
(Pool 'B' Participants: Columbia City, Don Ayres Time Corners National, Foster Park, Hamilton Park, Holy Cross, Leo Boys, St. Joe Central American, Southeast)
Pool 'A' Tournament
St. Joe Central National 10, Don Ayres Time Corners American 0
Elmhurst 7, Georgetown National 1
Churubusco 14, Weisser Park 0
Georgetown American 6, Auburn 5
Georgetown National 22, Don Ayres Time Corners American 7
Churubusco 11, Elmhurst 0
Auburn 17, Weisser Park 0
Georgetown American 6, Northcrest 1
Churubusco 12, Don Ayres Time Corners American 11
Auburn 9, Elmhurst 6
Northcrest 9, Weisser Park 4
St. Joe Central National 8, Georgetown National 1
Auburn d. Don Ayres Time Corners American
Elmhurst 9, Northcrest 1
Georgetown American d. Weisser Park
Churubusco d. St. Joe Central National
St. Joe Central National 15, Northcrest 5
Georgetown National d. Georgetown American
Pool 'B' Tournament
Leo Boys 9, Southeast 3
St. Joe Central American 7, Hamilton Park 4
Columbia City 12, Don Ayres Time Corners National 11
Holy Cross 12, Foster Park 6
St. Joe Central American 20, Southeast 12
Leo Boys 10, Don Ayres Time Corners National 9
Holy Cross 10, Hamilton Park 0
Columbia City 6, Foster Park 5
Holy Cross 12, Don Ayres Time Corners National 1
St. Joe Central American 6, Columbia City 4
Leo Boys 8, Hamilton Park 0
Foster Park 8, Southeast 7
13 - Leo Boys versus Columbia City (7/11)
14 - Hamilton Park versus Foster Park (7/11)
Holy Cross d. Southeast
16 - Don Ayres Time Corners National versus St. Joe Central National (7/12)
Pool 'A' Standings |
W |
L |
| Churubusco |
4 |
0 |
| St. Joe Central National |
3 |
1 |
| Auburn |
3 |
1 |
| Georgetown American |
3 |
1 |
| Elmhurst |
2 |
2 |
| Georgetown National |
2 |
2 |
| Northcrest |
1 |
3 |
| Don Ayres Time Corners American |
0 |
4 |
| Weisser Park |
0 |
4 |
|
Pool 'B' Standings |
W |
L |
| Holy Cross |
4 |
0 |
| St. Joe Central American |
3 |
0 |
| Leo Boys |
3 |
0 |
| Columbia City |
2 |
1 |
| Foster Park |
1 |
2 |
| Don Ayres Time Corners National |
0 |
3 |
| Hamilton Park |
0 |
3 |
| Southeast |
0 |
4 |
The top four teams in each pool advance to elimination round competition.
Ties are broken based on records in head-to-head competition among tied teams. If a clear winner cannot be determined from head-to-head results, the tie is broken by calculating the ratio of runs allowed to defensive innings played for all teams involved in the tie. The team with the lowest runs-per-defensive-inning ratio advances.
In the event of a tie involving three or more teams, once the initial tie is broken, the remaining tied teams are again compared on head-to-head record to determine if a clear winner can be identified. If no clear winner can be identified from head-to-head results among the remaining tied teams, the runs-per-defensive-inning ratio is again used. This process is repeated until all ties have been broken.
District 10 Finals
Host - Don Ayres Time Corners (Fort Wayne)
At Don Ayres Field #5
Quarterfinal Round (July 14 and 15):
Churubusco 6, Columbia City 0
St. Joe Central National 11, Leo Boys 8
Game 3 - Auburn versus St. Joe Central American (7/15)
Holy Cross d. Georgetown American
Semifinal Round (Saturday, July 16):
St. Joe Central National d. Churubusco
Holy Cross d. Winner 3
Championship Game (Monday, July 18):
Holy Cross 4, St. Joe Central National 2 (TITLE)
Click here to return to the top of the page.
Indiana District 11 Tournament
Tournament Results:
District 11 is using a pool play format. Leagues are divided into two pools for round-robin competition, and the top two teams in each pool advance to the district semifinals. All games played after the completion of pool competition will use a single-elimination format.
Pool Competition Results:
(Pool 'A' Participants: Chet Waggoner #1, Maurice Mathys #2, New Prairie, South East, South Side, and Warren Township #1)
(Pool 'B' Participants: Chet Waggoner #2, East Side, Maurice Mathys #1, North Judson, and Warren Township #2)
Pool 'A' Tournament
Host - East Side (South Bend)
Chet Waggoner #1 19, Maurice Mathys #2 0
South East 11, New Prairie 2
Warren Township #1 11, South Side 0
New Prairie 6, South Side 5
Chet Waggoner #1 1, South East 0
Warren Township #1 16, Maurice Mathys #2 1
Chet Waggoner #1 17, New Prairie 1
Warren Township #1 4, South East 1
South Side 12, Maurice Mathys #2 11
Warren Township #1 9, New Prairie 1
South East 7, Maurice Mathys #2 2
Maurice Mathys #2 6, New Prairie 3
Chet Waggoner #1 6, Warren Township #1 1
South East 10, South Side 0
Chet Waggoner #1 4, South Side 2
Pool 'B' Tournament
Host - Chet Waggoner (South Bend)
Chet Waggoner #2 8, Maurice Mathys #1 0
North Judson d. Warren Township #2
East Side 10, Maurice Mathys #1 0
North Judson 4, Chet Waggoner #2 2
5 - Warren Township #2 versus Maurice Mathys #1 (7/11)
East Side 16, Chet Waggoner #2 0
East Side 8, Warren Township #2 0
Maurice Mathys #1 7, North Judson 3
Chet Waggoner #2 16, Warren Township #2 6
East Side 13, North Judson 0
Pool 'A' Standings |
W |
L |
| Chet Waggoner #1 |
5 |
0 |
| Warren Township #1 |
4 |
1 |
| South East |
3 |
2 |
| Maurice Mathys #2 |
1 |
4 |
| New Prairie |
1 |
4 |
| South Side |
1 |
4 |
|
Pool 'B' Standings |
W |
L |
| East Side |
4 |
0 |
| North Judson |
2 |
2 |
| Chet Waggoner #2 |
2 |
2 |
| Maurice Mathys #1 |
1 |
2 |
| Warren Township #2 |
0 |
3 |
The top two teams in each pool advance to elimination round competition.
Ties are broken based on records in head-to-head competition among tied teams. If a clear winner cannot be determined from head-to-head results, the tie is broken by calculating the ratio of runs allowed to defensive innings played for all teams involved in the tie. The team with the lowest runs-per-defensive-inning ratio advances.
In the event of a tie involving three or more teams, once the initial tie is broken, the remaining tied teams are again compared on head-to-head record to determine if a clear winner can be identified. If no clear winner can be identified from head-to-head results among the remaining tied teams, the runs-per-defensive-inning ratio is again used. This process is repeated until all ties have been broken.
District 11 Finals
Championship Game Host - East Side (South Bend)
Semifinal Round:
Chet Waggoner #1 d. North Judson
East Side 3, Warren Township #1 1
Championship Game:
East Side 10, Chet Waggoner #1 1 (TITLE)
Click here to return to the top of the page.
Indiana District 12 Tournament
Tournament Results:
District 12 is using a pool play format, with leagues divided into two pools for round-robin competition.
Pool Competition Results:
(Pool 'B' Participants: Bartholomew County National, Bedford, Mitchell, Seymour, and Smithville)
Other leagues are competing in the Pool 'A' tournament.
Pool 'B' Tournament
Host - Bedford
Seymour 18, Bartholomew County National 0
Mitchell 4, Bedford 3
Smithville 16, Bartholomew County 1 National
Seymouth 10, Bedford 4 (10 innings)
Mitchell 2, Smithville 1
Bedford 10, Bartholomew County National 0
Mitchell 6, Bartholomew County National 0 (forfeit)
Seymour 10, Smithville 5
Seymour 11, Mitchell 0 (4 innings)
10 - Smithville versus Bedford (7/16)
We have not received a report on results from Pool 'A'. Center Grove White and Center Grove Red finished as the top teams in this pool and advanced to the semifinal round.
Pool 'B' Standings |
W |
L |
| Seymour |
4 |
0 |
| Mitchell |
3 |
1 |
| Bedford |
1 |
2 |
| Smithville |
1 |
2 |
| Bartholomew County |
0 |
4 |
Ties are broken based on records in head-to-head competition among tied teams. If a clear winner cannot be determined from head-to-head results, the tie is broken by calculating the ratio of runs allowed to defensive innings played for all teams involved in the tie. The team with the lowest runs-per-defensive-inning ratio advances.
In the event of a tie involving three or more teams, once the initial tie is broken, the remaining tied teams are again compared on head-to-head record to determine if a clear winner can be identified. If no clear winner can be identified from head-to-head results among the remaining tied teams, the runs-per-defensive-inning ratio is again used. This process is repeated until all ties have been broken.
District 12 Finals
Semifinal Round:
Seymour 4, Center Grove Red 2
Center Grove White 7, Mitchell 2
Championship Game:
Seymour 10, Center Grove White 0 (TITLE)
Click here to return to the top of the page.
Indiana District 13 Tournament
Tournament Results:
District 13 is using a pool play format. Leagues are divided into two pools for round-robin competition, and the top four teams in each pool advance to the quarterfinal round. All games played after the completion of pool competition will use a single-elimination format.
Pool Competition Results:
(Western Pool Participants: Fort Branch, Haubstadt, North Posey, Petersburgh, and Princeton)
Other leagues are competing in the Eastern Pool.
Western Pool Tournament
North Posey 10, Haubstadt 0
Fort Branch 15, Petersburgh 5
North Posey 7, Princeton 2
Petersburgh 15, Haubstadt 2
North Posey 6, Fort Branch 2
Princeton d. Haubstadt
Princeton 4, Fort Branch 1
North Posey 10, Petersburgh 0
North Branch 5, Haubstadt 2
Princeton 3, Petersburgh 2
We have not received a report on results from the Eastern Pool. Jasper and three other teams advanced to the quarterfinal round.
Western Pool Standings |
W |
L |
| North Posey |
4 |
0 |
| Princeton |
3 |
1 |
| Fort Branch |
2 |
2 |
| Petersburgh |
1 |
3 |
| Haubstadt |
0 |
4 |
The top four teams in each pool advance to elimination round competition.
Ties are broken based on records in head-to-head competition among tied teams. If a clear winner cannot be determined from head-to-head results, the tie is broken by calculating the ratio of runs allowed to defensive innings played for all teams involved in the tie. The team with the lowest runs-per-defensive-inning ratio advances.
In the event of a tie involving three or more teams, once the initial tie is broken, the remaining tied teams are again compared on head-to-head record to determine if a clear winner can be identified. If no clear winner can be identified from head-to-head results among the remaining tied teams, the runs-per-defensive-inning ratio is again used. This process is repeated until all ties have been broken.
District 13 Finals
Quarterfinal Round (Sunday, July 17):
North Posey 7, Petersburgh 0
Fort Branch 3, Princeton 2
Game 3 - Eastern Pool First Place versus Eastern Pool Fourth Place
Game 4 - Eastern Pool Second Place versus Eastern Pool Third Place
Semifinal Round (Monday, July 18):
North Posey 6, Fort Branch 3
Game 6 - Winner 3 versus Winner 4
Championship Game (Tuesday, July 19):
Jasper 13, North Posey 0 (5 innings; TITLE)
Click here to return to the top of the page.
Indiana District 14 Tournament
Tournament Results:
District 14 is using a pool play format. Leagues are divided into two pools for round-robin competition, and the top four teams in each pool advance to the quarterfinal round. All games played after the completion of pool competition will use a single-elimination format.
Pool Competition Results:
(Pool 1 Participants: Edwardsburg, Elkhart F.O.P. 52, Goshen, Osolo #1, Middlebury, and Mishawaka Southwest)
(Pool 2 Participants: Baugo, Bristol, Cleveland Township, Concord, Osolo #2, and Warsaw)
Pool 1 Tournament
Edwardsburg 6, Elkhart F.O.P. 52 3
Goshen 5, Mishawaka Southwest 0
Middlebury 2, Osolo #1 1
Goshen 4, Edwardsburg 1
Middlebury 18, Elkhart F.O.P. 52 2
Osolo #1 7, Mishawaka Southwest 1
Mishawaka Southwest 7, Elkhart F.O.P. 52 0
Osolo #1 9, Goshen 8
Middlebury 10, Edwardsburg 4
Osolo #1 7, Edwardsburg 1
Middlebury 5, Mishawaka Southwest 0
Goshen 10, Elkhart F.O.P. 52 0
Pool 2 Tournament
Baugo 9, Bristol 3
Warsaw 14, Cleveland Township 6
Concord 7, Osolo #2 1
Cleveland Township 14, Bristol 0
Osolo #2 4, Baugo 3
Concord 8, Warsaw 1
Warsaw 7, Baugo 6
Cleveland Township 9, Concord 8
Osolo #2 5, Bristol 4
Concord 11, Bristol 0
Warsaw 6, Osolo #2 0
Cleveland Township 10, Baugo 9
Pool 1 Standings |
W |
L |
| Middlebury |
4 |
0 |
| Osolo #1 |
3 |
1 |
| Goshen |
3 |
1 |
| Mishawaka Southwest |
1 |
3 |
| Edwardsburg |
1 |
3 |
| Elkhart F.O.P. 52 |
0 |
4 |
|
Pool 2 Standings |
W |
L |
| Concord |
3 |
1 |
| Warsaw |
3 |
1 |
| Cleveland Township |
3 |
1 |
| Osolo #2 |
2 |
2 |
| Baugo |
1 |
3 |
| Bristol |
0 |
4 |
The top four teams in each pool advance to the semifinal round.
Ties are broken based on records in head-to-head competition among tied teams. If a clear winner cannot be determined from head-to-head results, the tie is broken by calculating the ratio of runs allowed to defensive innings played for all teams involved in the tie. The team with the lowest runs-per-defensive-inning ratio advances.
In the event of a tie involving three or more teams, once the initial tie is broken, the remaining tied teams are again compared on head-to-head record to determine if a clear winner can be identified. If no clear winner can be identified from head-to-head results among the remaining tied teams, the runs-per-defensive-inning ratio is again used. This process is repeated until all ties have been broken.
District 14 Finals
Championship Game Host - Warsaw
Quarterfinal Round:
Middlebury 13, Osolo #2 4
Goshen 1, Warsaw 0
Concord 5, Mishawaka Southwest 0
Cleveland Township 7, Osolo #1 4
Semifinal Round:
Middlebury 2, Goshen 1
Cleveland Township 10, Concord 9
Championship Game:
Middlebury 5, Cleveland Township 2 (TITLE)
Click here to return to the top of the page.
The Unpage brings you unprecedented tournament coverage.
Thank-you for visiting Unpage Publications!
Contact the Unpage.
Copyright © 2006, Unpage Publications. All rights reserved.
Last revision: 06/11/2006
